Application Note · Thermal Engineering · Ramanu Systems

Aluminum PCB vs FR4: A Real Thermal Imaging Test on a 3.3V LDO Regulator (with Video)

We ran two identical TLV740P-based 3.3V LDO modules — one on standard FR4, one on an Aluminum (Metal-Core) PCB — at the same 5V input and 300mA constant load, and used thermochromic color-change coating to visually map heat spreading in real time. Here’s exactly what happened, second by second.


TL;DR — Key Result

Under identical conditions (5V input, 3.3V output, 300mA continuous load), the FR4-based LDO module developed a visible hotspot within ~11 seconds and reached “deep white” (fully heated, >30°C) thermal saturation by 100 seconds. The Aluminum-core (MCPCB) LDO module stayed predominantly pink (cooler, <30°C) throughout the same period, with heat visibly spreading laterally across the metal core instead of concentrating under the regulator package.

After 5 minutes at steady state, the FR4 module’s thermal “blob” was at maximum size around the LDO, while the Aluminum PCB module remained largely pink — direct visual proof that a metal-core substrate measurably lowers LDO junction temperature under sustained load.

Watch the Experiment

The full real-time thermal color-change sequence — from power-on to 5-minute steady state — is captured on video below.

If the player above doesn’t load, watch it directly on YouTube ▶

Test Setup

LDO under test TLV740P-based 3.3V LDO (same regulator family used in the TrueVolt-74033 module)
Boards compared (A) Standard FR4 PCB  vs  (B) Aluminum Metal-Core PCB (MCPCB)
Input voltage 5 V DC (identical for both boards)
Output / load 3.3 V regulated output, constant 300 mA load on both modules
Thermal indicator Thermochromic coating applied directly over the LDO package and surrounding copper. Pink = cool (below ~30°C), Transparent / White = heated (above ~30°C)
Observation window Power-on (T0) through 5 minutes of continuous operation, recorded on video

Because both modules were powered from the same source at the same time, under the same load, any difference in the rate or pattern of color change can be attributed directly to the PCB substrate material — not to the regulator IC, load, or ambient conditions.

Step-by-Step Observations

In every photo below, the FR4 module is the green-PCB board (top-left) and the Aluminum (MCPCB) module is the white/silver board (bottom-right). Both are powered, loaded, and photographed at the same time.

T = 0s — Power ON (Baseline)

Both FR4 (green PCB) and Aluminum PCB (white MCPCB) LDO modules at power-on, thermochromic coating solid red/pink at ambient temperature

Both modules begin solid red/pink — confirming both boards start at the same ambient temperature, with no pre-existing thermal bias. This is the control reference point for the rest of the test.

T = ~11s — The Hotspot Forms on FR4

FR4 PCB LDO module showing early hotspot formation as thermochromic coating begins fading near the regulator, while Aluminum PCB module remains red

  • FR4 PCB (top): The coating directly under the LDO package begins fading toward white almost immediately. The fiberglass-resin substrate has very low thermal conductivity (roughly 0.2–0.3 W/m·K), so heat generated by the regulator has nowhere to go but straight up into the coating — it can’t spread sideways through the board.
  • Aluminum PCB (bottom): The coating remains solid red/pink with no visible change. The aluminum core begins acting as a heat spreader from the very first seconds, conducting heat away from the package footprint laterally through the metal base.

T = ~40s — The Escape Phase

FR4 PCB module shows a fully formed white hotspot while Aluminum PCB module shows only minor lightening, at 40 seconds into the LDO thermal test

  • FR4 PCB (top): The white “hotspot” zone is now clearly formed and well-defined around the LDO. Because the heat is trapped locally, the regulator’s junction temperature climbs quickly toward its thermal limit.
  • Aluminum PCB (bottom): Still predominantly red/pink, with only a very subtle lightening starting to appear. Heat is escaping into the aluminum base rather than concentrating at the source.

T = ~100s — Thermal Saturation

FR4 PCB module nearly fully transparent indicating high temperature while Aluminum PCB module is only lightly faded at 100 seconds

  • FR4 PCB (top): The coating across most of the board has now turned transparent/white — indicating the area has been at or above the threshold temperature for some time. Heat is dissipating inefficiently, mostly through still air at the board surface.
  • Aluminum PCB (bottom): Has lightened from deep red to a pale pink, but is nowhere near as faded as the FR4 module. The metal core is actively absorbing thermal energy from the hotspot and distributing it across a much larger surface area, keeping the peak temperature lower.

T = 5 minutes — Steady State (300mA Continuous Load)

At 5 minute steady state, FR4 PCB module is fully transparent white indicating high junction temperature while Aluminum PCB module remains pink, indicating lower temperature

  • FR4 PCB (top): The coating has gone fully transparent/”deep white” across nearly the entire board — the highest temperature state observed in the test. The fiberglass substrate has no further capacity to move heat away from the component.
  • Aluminum PCB (bottom): Remains a clearly pink/salmon shade — visibly cooler than the FR4 module at the same point in time. The metal core continues to wick heat away from the regulator and spread it across the board, confirming a lower and more stable junction temperature under the same electrical conditions.

The Full Sequence at a Glance (T0 → 5 min)

Nine-frame composite timeline showing the FR4 PCB LDO module progressively turning white from T0 to 5-minute steady state while the Aluminum PCB module stays pink

Frame-by-frame composite from the recorded experiment. Watch the FR4 board (top of each frame) progressively wash out to white, while the Aluminum PCB module (bottom of each frame) stays comparatively pink throughout the same 5-minute window.

Summary: FR4 vs Aluminum PCB Under Identical LDO Load

Aspect FR4 PCB Aluminum PCB (MCPCB)
Heat spreading Poor — heat stays localized near the LDO Excellent — heat spreads laterally across the metal core
Time to visible hotspot ~11 seconds Not visible at 11s; delayed and reduced
Junction temperature trend Rises rapidly toward thermal limit Rises slowly, stabilizes lower
5-minute steady state Thermal “blob” at maximum size, deep white Predominantly pink, lower stable temperature
Continuous load capability Limited by local heat buildup Improved — supports sustained 300mA more comfortably
External heatsink need Often required for similar loads Often unnecessary — board acts as heatsink

Why This Matters for LDO-Based Designs

Linear regulators dissipate the voltage difference between input and output as heat — P = (VIN − VOUT) × ILOAD. For a 5V-to-3.3V LDO at 300mA, that’s roughly 0.5W dissipated directly in the regulator package, with nowhere to go except through the PCB.

On a standard FR4 board, that 0.5W stays concentrated under the package because FR4’s thermal conductivity is roughly 0.2–0.3 W/m·K — close to an insulator. The result, as this test shows visually, is a fast-forming localized hotspot. Sustained operation at elevated junction temperature accelerates thermal stress on the regulator die, nearby ceramic capacitors, and solder joints — a well-documented driver of long-term field failures in compact, densely-packed modules.

An aluminum (metal-core) PCB inserts a high-conductivity layer directly beneath the copper circuit layer. Instead of acting like a thermal “wall,” the board becomes part of the cooling path — spreading heat across the entire board area, lowering peak junction temperature, and often eliminating the need for an external heatsink altogether.

How This Applies to the TrueVolt-74033

The TrueVolt-74033 is a 3.3V / 300mA ultra-low-noise LDO module built on exactly this principle — an Aluminum (Metal-Core) PCB paired with a genuine Texas Instruments TLV74033 regulator and Samsung MLCC capacitors. The thermal behavior demonstrated in this experiment is the same mechanism that gives the TrueVolt-74033 its steady-state thermal advantage over conventional FR4-based LDO modules:

  • Lower steady-state junction temperature at the same load current
  • No fast-forming hotspot under the regulator package
  • Reduced thermal stress on the LDO and surrounding components — supporting longer operating life
  • Often no external heatsink required in space-constrained embedded, IoT, or imaging applications

Methodology note: This is a qualitative visual thermal comparison using thermochromic coating as a binary-threshold indicator (color change above ~30°C), not a calibrated infrared thermal imaging or thermocouple measurement. It is intended to illustrate the relative heat-spreading behavior of FR4 versus Aluminum PCB substrates under identical electrical conditions, consistent with the established thermal-conductivity differences between these materials (FR4 ≈ 0.2–0.3 W/m·K vs. Aluminum core substrates, which are dramatically higher).

Build with the Aluminum PCB Advantage

The TrueVolt-74033 brings this metal-core thermal performance to your 3.3V power rail — with 100% authentic TI and Samsung components.

View TrueVolt-74033 on ramanusystems.com →

© 2026 Ramanu Systems. Texas Instruments, Samsung, and Diotec trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top